Join Today













Site Sponsor
Results 1 to 2 of 2
  1. #1
    Premium Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Posts
    33,354
    Rep Power
    397

    Default New York asks wireless carriers why they oppose antitheft switch: NYT

    (Reuters) - New York State attorney general is investigating why American cellphone carriers are yet to support antitheft software on Samsung smartphones, raising questions about possible coordination among the biggest carriers, the New York Times reported. New York Attorney General Eric Schneiderman sent letters to top executives of AT&T Inc, Verizon Wireless, Sprint, T-Mobile US Inc and U.S. Cellular, seeking information about their decision to prevent Samsung from featuring a "kill switch" in carrier-approved smartphones, the newspaper said. "If carriers are colluding to prevent theft-deterrent features from being pre-installed on devices as means to sell more insurance products, they are doing so at the expense of public safety and putting their customers in danger," Schneiderman said in a statement, the New York Times reported. (http://r.reuters.com/xux35v) Schneiderman's office and the five carriers could not be reached for comment by Reuters outside of regular U.S. business hours.



    More...

  2. #2
    BANNED
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Location
    Naples Florida
    Posts
    346
    Rep Power
    0

    Default Re: New York asks wireless carriers why they oppose antitheft switch: NYT

    The big reason why is MONEY!

    Its the reason that Samsung invests no money in developing a security feature for changing the meid like Motorola does.

    MONEY!

    If they add the KILL SWITCH it does 3 things

    1 - Costs more money which makes it harder for the carriers to sell

    2 - Gives Samsung something to advertise as a full proof way to protect your phone killing revenue for existing security apps (I know sprint and Verizon both have one)

    3 - How long would it last before there was a workaround for it anyhow

    Apple has this for all iDevices but the big difference is that the USER implements it - It isn't mandated by apple or the state

    On android phones there are plenty of encryption apps that "Kill" the phone and wipe all user data so the state has no claim that it harms the user

    The state is way over reaching

    Whats new

    elisa191


 

Similar Threads

  1. Lady Gaga launches 'Artpop' at VIP New York party
    By Wireless News in forum Upcoming Technologies
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 11-11-2013, 06:33 AM
  2. Lady Gaga launches 'Artpop' at VIP New York party
    By Wireless News in forum Upcoming Technologies
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 11-11-2013, 04:22 AM
  3. New York Takes Another Step to Curb Phone Theft
    By cdmagurus.com in forum Upcoming Technologies
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 10-18-2013, 08:30 AM
  4. New York City expands subway Wi-Fi service
    By Wireless News in forum Upcoming Technologies
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 04-25-2013, 01:20 PM
  5. Apple Asks For $707M More in Damages from Samsung
    By cdmagurus.com in forum CDMA Iphones
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 09-23-2012, 09:40 AM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •