cdmagurus.com
11-21-2013, 05:12 PM
A jury has ordered Samsung to pay $290 million to Apple for infringement of several of its patents in multiple Samsung smartphones and tablets.
The verdict, reached on the third day of deliberation by the eight-person jury, is less than the $380 million Apple was demanding for the infringement (http://www.macworld.com/article/2063760/apple-experts-seek-to-justify-380-million-damages-claim-against-samsung.html), but it's much more than the $52 million that Samsung had been arguing it should pay.
The verdict represents a second victory for Apple in its multiyear patent fight against Samsung in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California.
Last year a jury in the same San Jose courtroom ruled Samsung should pay just over $1 billion (http://www.macworld.com/article/1168285/apple_samsung_the_verdict_is_in.html) for infringement of five Apple patents in multiple Samsung phones and tablets. But afterward, Judge Lucy Koh ordered a new trial to reconsider $450 million of the damages after finding the previous jury had applied an "impermissible legal theory" to its calculations. Thursday's verdict is the result of that new trial.
To read this article in full or to leave a comment, please click here (http://cdmagurus.com/article/2066140/jury-orders-samsung-to-pay-290m-to-apple-in-patent-case.html#jump)
More... (http://www.pcworld.com/article/2066140/jury-orders-samsung-to-pay-290m-to-apple-in-patent-case.html#tk.rss_all)
The verdict, reached on the third day of deliberation by the eight-person jury, is less than the $380 million Apple was demanding for the infringement (http://www.macworld.com/article/2063760/apple-experts-seek-to-justify-380-million-damages-claim-against-samsung.html), but it's much more than the $52 million that Samsung had been arguing it should pay.
The verdict represents a second victory for Apple in its multiyear patent fight against Samsung in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California.
Last year a jury in the same San Jose courtroom ruled Samsung should pay just over $1 billion (http://www.macworld.com/article/1168285/apple_samsung_the_verdict_is_in.html) for infringement of five Apple patents in multiple Samsung phones and tablets. But afterward, Judge Lucy Koh ordered a new trial to reconsider $450 million of the damages after finding the previous jury had applied an "impermissible legal theory" to its calculations. Thursday's verdict is the result of that new trial.
To read this article in full or to leave a comment, please click here (http://cdmagurus.com/article/2066140/jury-orders-samsung-to-pay-290m-to-apple-in-patent-case.html#jump)
More... (http://www.pcworld.com/article/2066140/jury-orders-samsung-to-pay-290m-to-apple-in-patent-case.html#tk.rss_all)