cdmagurus.com
09-05-2013, 01:50 AM
A jury in Seattle, Washington, has ruled in favor of Microsoft in a patent dispute with Motorola Mobility over standards patents, according to court records.
The jury was to decide Wednesday whether Motorola, now a part of Google, breached (http://www.pcworld.com/article/2047453/microsoft-motorola-trial-to-resume-monday.html) its agreements to provide certain technology to Microsoft on fair and reasonable terms.
The dispute between Microsoft and Motorola in the U.S. District Court for the Western District of Washington at Seattle can be traced to 2010 when Motorola asked Microsoft to pay royalties for Motorola technology contributed to the H.264 video compression standard and 802.11 wireless networking standard. Microsoft was willing to pay a royalty, but found the 2.25 percent of the product price that Motorola had sought was too high. Motorola’s terms were designed to ensure that Microsoft would not accept and Motorola could then sue for an injunction on its products, Microsoft argued in court.
Patents that go into defining standards, also known as standard-essential patents, usually carry with them the understanding that they will be licensed under fair, reasonable and non-discriminatory (FRAND) terms.
To read this article in full or to leave a comment, please click here (http://cdmagurus.com/article/2048168/microsoft-wins-jury-trial-in-patent-dispute-with-motorola.html#jump)
More... (http://www.pcworld.com/article/2048168/microsoft-wins-jury-trial-in-patent-dispute-with-motorola.html#tk.rss_all)
The jury was to decide Wednesday whether Motorola, now a part of Google, breached (http://www.pcworld.com/article/2047453/microsoft-motorola-trial-to-resume-monday.html) its agreements to provide certain technology to Microsoft on fair and reasonable terms.
The dispute between Microsoft and Motorola in the U.S. District Court for the Western District of Washington at Seattle can be traced to 2010 when Motorola asked Microsoft to pay royalties for Motorola technology contributed to the H.264 video compression standard and 802.11 wireless networking standard. Microsoft was willing to pay a royalty, but found the 2.25 percent of the product price that Motorola had sought was too high. Motorola’s terms were designed to ensure that Microsoft would not accept and Motorola could then sue for an injunction on its products, Microsoft argued in court.
Patents that go into defining standards, also known as standard-essential patents, usually carry with them the understanding that they will be licensed under fair, reasonable and non-discriminatory (FRAND) terms.
To read this article in full or to leave a comment, please click here (http://cdmagurus.com/article/2048168/microsoft-wins-jury-trial-in-patent-dispute-with-motorola.html#jump)
More... (http://www.pcworld.com/article/2048168/microsoft-wins-jury-trial-in-patent-dispute-with-motorola.html#tk.rss_all)